The Sound Blaster 16 featured the then widely used TEA amplifier IC which, in the configuration Creative had chosen, would allow approximately milliwatts 0. Rich Sorkin was General Manager of the global business during this time, responsible for product planning, product management, marketing and OEM sales. Sound Blaster 16 June , the successor to the Sound Blaster Pro , introduced bit digital audio sampling to the Sound Blaster line. There is no workaround for this flaw and it occurs with all operating systems since it is an issue at the hardware level. As a result, this chip was generally ignored by the market.
|Date Added:||26 February 2014|
|File Size:||56.26 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It gives out new possibilities to assume which one is better. Retrieved from ” https: I am usually fascinated by soundcards, yet this discussion makes me yawn.
Creative Labs Ct Sound Blaster Vibra 16c ISA Sound Card () | eBay
The one on the Asus, manufactured by STMicroelectronics, has support for a gain of rceative, where as the one on the Creative is only 20dB. One that has the crystal is labeled as a Sound blaster ct I tend to like it, it does not make much noise and is rock solid. I’m sure everyone who bought a Gold card tried these out, and they were certainly significantly better than the equivalent wavetable sounds, but not exactly jaw-dropping, and a bit of a fiddle to use.
The Sound Blaster 16 was hugely popular. The following model numbers were assigned to the Sound Blaster 16 WavEffects: Most Sound Blaster 16 cards feature connectors for CD-audio input.
This page was last edited on 5 Octoberat Archived from the original specification on February 2, The Sound Blaster 16 featured the then widely used TEA amplifier IC which, creatuve the configuration Creative had chosen, would allow approximately milliwatts 0.
Views Read Edit View history.
Creative Labs Ct2960 Sound Blaster Vibra 16c ISA Sound Card ()
Sound cardsaccessed August 6, The following model numbers were assigned to the Sound Blaster As many Sound Blaster 16s are now well over 20 years old, many cards suffer from symptoms related to aging capacitors, ranging from muffled or distorted output to the cards failing to function properly.
Anyway, my reason for this post is to ask whether anyone on this forum has had any experience with this particular card, and if it’s any different from an actual Creative Sound Blaster Vibra 16C.
The Sound Blaster 16 is a series creativw sound cards by Creative Technology. Sound on Sound November However, that doesn’t necessarily mean one has higher output quality then the other. Has anyone had an opportunity to test this card before?
Creative Labs Sound Blaster CT2960 Vibra 16c 1995 ISA Card
As computer needs creatjve it became common for a system to need more than 1 ATA interface. Users browsing this forum: Other than that, they’re basically the same card.
Archived copy as title Use mdy dates from March I’m vibga interested to hear what the wavetable on that card sounds like. The Creative WaveSynth is a software based WaveTable Synth which provides additional voices for composition and playback.
Retrieved December 19, Output quality should be comparable, but power will be higher on the Asus card so if you use passive speakers, I’d op for the Asus. Archived from the original on December 19, My Retro Gaming PC: Computer Gaming World in stated that “We were not impressed with the quality of the digital audio” of the Sound Blaster 16 or 16 ASP, vjbra “pops and extra noise” and incomplete Sound Blaster compatibility.
In addition, with regard to the headphone amplifier design on most boards, Creative did not fully adhere the datasheets’ recommendations on component values, potentially impacting the amplified output’s sound quality.
Board index All times are UTC. As a result, this chip was generally ignored by the market.